Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.
This text of 123 A. 926 (Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, [124]*124and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.
We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262.
The orders appealed from are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 A. 926, 279 Pa. 123, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moy-v-colonial-finance-corp-pa-1924.