Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.

123 A. 926, 279 Pa. 123, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 682

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 7, 1924·No. Appeals, Nos. 174 and 175·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, [124] and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.

We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262.

The orders appealed from are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

In these two cases, the court below refused to enter judgments for want of sufficient affidavits of defense, [124] and there followed the instant appeals, which were presented to us as one.

We are not convinced the court below erred in its conclusion that a proper judicial determination of the controversies between the parties would be facilitated by an opportunity for a broader inquiry into the facts than is presented by the bare pleadings; therefore it did not err in discharging plaintiff’s rules: Griffith v. Sitgreaves, 81* Pa. 378; Marquis v. McKay, 216 Pa. 307; Beck v. Schekter, 235 Pa. 253; County Savings Bank v. Gillette, 273 Pa. 262.

The orders appealed from are affirmed.

Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp., 123 A. 926, 279 Pa. 123, 1924 Pa. LEXIS 682 (Pa. 1924).

Pincite

123 A. 926 (Moy v. Colonial Finance Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related