Moxey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Moxey v. State

698 So. 2d 941, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10576, 1997 WL 577591

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 17, 1997

DocketNo. 96-3129

StatusPublished

This text of 698 So. 2d 941 (Moxey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Moxey v. State, 698 So. 2d 941, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10576, 1997 WL 577591 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence founded on a violation of Appellant’s probation are reversed. The state does not dispute that there was insufficient evidence of Appellant’s failure to comply with the payment provisions in conditions 10 and 11, as Appellant did not miss a payment deadline nor was there a schedule of payments due. Melecio v. State, 662 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). As to the violation of condition 3, moving without notification, we affirm.

As we cannot determine whether the court would impose the same judgment and sentence based solely on a violation of condition 3, we remand for further proceedings.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment and sentence founded on a violation of Appellant’s probation are reversed. The state does not dispute that there was insufficient evidence of Appellant’s failure to comply with the payment provisions in conditions 10 and 11, as Appellant did not miss a payment deadline nor was there a schedule of payments due. Melecio v. State, 662 So.2d 408 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). As to the violation of condition 3, moving without notification, we affirm.

As we cannot determine whether the court would impose the same judgment and sentence based solely on a violation of condition 3, we remand for further proceedings.

STONE, C.J., and POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

698 So. 2d 941, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 10576, 1997 WL 577591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moxey-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack