Mowery v. . Mowery

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mowery v. . Mowery

85 S.E. 7, 169 N.C. 248, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 193

DecidedApril 28, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 85 S.E. 7 (Mowery v. . Mowery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mowery v. . Mowery, 85 S.E. 7, 169 N.C. 248, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 193 (N.C. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

PER OuriaM.

Tbe only assignment of error set out in tbe record is in these words: “Tbe defendant assigned as error tbe judgment rendered herein.” It is contended by the defendant tbat tbe affidavits and evidence offered upon tbe motion for alimony are insufficient to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe judge.

• No sucb assignment of error is set out in tbe record. If tbe appellant desired to present sucb a contention, be should have assigned bis error by pointing out tbe particular finding of fact which is not supported by tbe evidence.

Nevertheless, we have examined tbe affidavits, and find tbat bis Honor’s findings were fully sustained, and they warrant tbe order allowing alimony to tbe plaintiff pendente lite.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER OuriaM.

Tbe only assignment of error set out in tbe record is in these words: “Tbe defendant assigned as error tbe judgment rendered herein.” It is contended by the defendant tbat tbe affidavits and evidence offered upon tbe motion for alimony are insufficient to support tbe findings of fact made by tbe judge.

• No sucb assignment of error is set out in tbe record. If tbe appellant desired to present sucb a contention, be should have assigned bis error by pointing out tbe particular finding of fact which is not supported by tbe evidence.

Nevertheless, we have examined tbe affidavits, and find tbat bis Honor’s findings were fully sustained, and they warrant tbe order allowing alimony to tbe plaintiff pendente lite.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

85 S.E. 7, 169 N.C. 248, 1915 N.C. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mowery-v-mowery-nc-1915.