Mower v. Beard

99 N.E. 971, 213 Mass. 198, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 702
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 99 N.E. 971 (Mower v. Beard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mower v. Beard, 99 N.E. 971, 213 Mass. 198, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 702 (Mass. 1912).

Opinion

Rugo, C. J.

Assuming (but without so deciding) in favor of the defendant that his appeal was seasonably'taken and properly entered here, no error is shown. The plea in abatement raised an issue of fact. The action of the Superior Court in overruling it presents no question of law. An appeal in an action at law brings before this court only errors of law apparent on the record. Electric Welding Co. v. Prince, 200 Mass. 386, 392.

Appeal dismissed with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fairbanks v. Beard
141 N.E. 590 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Bacon v. George
216 Mass. 519 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 N.E. 971, 213 Mass. 198, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mower-v-beard-mass-1912.