Mower v. Beard

99 N.E. 971, 213 Mass. 198, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 702
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 2, 1912·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rugo, C. J.

Assuming (but without so deciding) in favor of the defendant that his appeal was seasonably'taken and properly entered here, no error is shown. The plea in abatement raised an issue of fact. The action of the Superior Court in overruling it presents no question of law. An appeal in an action at law brings before this court only errors of law apparent on the record. Electric Welding Co. v. Prince, 200 Mass. 386, 392.

Appeal dismissed with double costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mower v. Beard, 99 N.E. 971, 213 Mass. 198, 1912 Mass. LEXIS 702 (Mass. 1912).

99 N.E. 971 (Mower v. Beard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fairbanks v. Beard
141 N.E. 590 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Bacon v. George
216 Mass. 519 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)