Mowatt v. Graham

1 Edw. Ch. 575
New York Court of Chancery·Decided April 1, 1833·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor.

I cannot make an order upon this petition. The' estate out of. which the advance roquked, >« [576]*576the wife’s property; and the court will not allow the husband to have it, unless she unites in the application and freely consents. The petition must be looked upon as Mr. Graham’s-; for, Mrs. Graham does not join by either signature or oath.

And even if she were consenting, still there would be a difficulty. The court is not in the habit of advancing money out of funds in court, except for maintenance and support. The petition merely states “ a necessary occasion ” for the allowance ; and what that may amount to, does not appear. A petition, in such a case,- must clearly show the grounds of requiring money for maintenance and support. I must dismiss this petition, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mowatt v. Graham, 1 Edw. Ch. 575 (N.Y. 1833).

1 Edw. Ch. 575 (Mowatt v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Keiffer v. Barney Bros.
31 Ala. 192 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1857)