Movsesian v. Versicherung Ag
This text of Movsesian v. Versicherung Ag (Movsesian v. Versicherung Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
VAZKEN MOVSESIAN; HARRY ARZOUMANIAN; GARO AYALTIN; MIRAN KHAGERIAN; ARA KHAJERIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated including thousands of senior citizens, disabled persons, and orphans as well as on behalf of the general public and acting in the public interest, No. 07-56722 Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. v. CV-03-09407- CAS-JWJ VICTORIA VERSICHERUNG AG, a German corporation; ERGO ORDER VERSICHERUNGSGRUPPE AG, a German corporation, Defendants, and MUNCHENER RUCKVERSICHERUNGS- GESELLSCHAFT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT AG, a German corporation, Defendant-Appellant. Filed November 7, 2011
20161 20162 MOVSESIAN v. VICTORIA VERSICHERUNG AG ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Judge Bybee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Movsesian v. Versicherung Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/movsesian-v-versicherung-ag-ca9-2011.