Movlaev v. Becerra

N.D. California

Movlaev v. Becerra

DecidedAugust 26, 2024

Docket3:24-cv-05016

StatusUnknown

This text of Movlaev v. Becerra (Movlaev v. Becerra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Movlaev v. Becerra, (N.D. Cal. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHINGISKHAN MOVLAEV, Case No. 24-cv-05016-SK

8 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v.

10 MOISES BECERRA, et al., 11 Respondents.

12 Petitioner Chingiskhan Movlaev has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus concerning 13 an alleged ongoing prolonged detention while in the custody of Immigration and Customs 14 Enforcement. The Court makes a preliminary finding that it has jurisdiction to consider this claim. 15 See Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 292-96(2018); see also Amarjeet Singh v. Gonzales, 499 16 F.3d 969, 977-78 (9th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to serve on 17 Respondents, by no later than August 30, 2024, a copy of the Petition with supporting documents1 18 and a copy of this Order. Respondents are ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue on 19 or before November 1, 2024. Petitioner shall have through September 5, 2024, to file whether he consents or declines to 20 the jurisdiction of a federal magistrate judge. Respondents shall have through September 13, 21 2024, to file their consent or declination to the jurisdiction of a federal magistrate judge. Any 22 party is “free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences.” 28 U.S.C. § 23 636(c)(2). 24 / / / 25 / / / 26

27 1 The Court sealed the supporting documents (Dkt. 1-1) sua sponte because they included 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 || Dated: August 26, 2024 3 _ firth [rw SALLIE KIM 4 United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHINGISKHAN MOVLAEV, Case No. 24-cv-05016-SK

8 Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 9 v.

10 MOISES BECERRA, et al., 11 Respondents.

12 Petitioner Chingiskhan Movlaev has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus concerning 13 an alleged ongoing prolonged detention while in the custody of Immigration and Customs 14 Enforcement. The Court makes a preliminary finding that it has jurisdiction to consider this claim. 15 See Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 292-96(2018); see also Amarjeet Singh v. Gonzales, 499 16 F.3d 969, 977-78 (9th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to serve on 17 Respondents, by no later than August 30, 2024, a copy of the Petition with supporting documents1 18 and a copy of this Order. Respondents are ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue on 19 or before November 1, 2024. Petitioner shall have through September 5, 2024, to file whether he consents or declines to 20 the jurisdiction of a federal magistrate judge. Respondents shall have through September 13, 21 2024, to file their consent or declination to the jurisdiction of a federal magistrate judge. Any 22 party is “free to withhold consent without adverse substantive consequences.” 28 U.S.C. § 23 636(c)(2). 24 / / / 25 / / / 26

27 1 The Court sealed the supporting documents (Dkt. 1-1) sua sponte because they included 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 || Dated: August 26, 2024 3 _ firth [rw SALLIE KIM 4 United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

= 17

Z 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Movlaev v. Becerra, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/movlaev-v-becerra-cand-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack