Movius v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Movius v. United States

118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 6, 1902

DocketNo. 67

StatusPublished

This text of 118 F. 1022 (Movius v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Movius v. United States, 118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a coal tar color or. dye, under paragraph 82, Tariff Act 1883, and was claimed to be free as an acid used for medicinal purposes, under paragraph 394 of said act This question has already been decided by the circuit court of appeals in Matheson & Co. v. U. S., 18 C. C. A. 143, 71 Fed. 394; -and, following the ruling there laid down, the decision of the board of appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a coal tar color or. dye, under paragraph 82, Tariff Act 1883, and was claimed to be free as an acid used for medicinal purposes, under paragraph 394 of said act This question has already been decided by the circuit court of appeals in Matheson & Co. v. U. S., 18 C. C. A. 143, 71 Fed. 394; -and, following the ruling there laid down, the decision of the board of appraisers is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/movius-v-united-states-circtsdny-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack