Movius v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Movius v. United States

118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 6, 1902·No. No. 67·Published

Opinion

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a coal tar color or. dye, under paragraph 82, Tariff Act 1883, and was claimed to be free as an acid used for medicinal purposes, under paragraph 394 of said act This question has already been decided by the circuit court of appeals in Matheson & Co. v. U. S., 18 C. C. A. 143, 71 Fed. 394; -and, following the ruling there laid down, the decision of the board of appraisers is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TOWNSEND, District Judge.

The merchandise in question was assessed for duty as a coal tar color or. dye, under paragraph 82, Tariff Act 1883, and was claimed to be free as an acid used for medicinal purposes, under paragraph 394 of said act This question has already been decided by the circuit court of appeals in Matheson & Co. v. U. S., 18 C. C. A. 143, 71 Fed. 394; -and, following the ruling there laid down, the decision of the board of appraisers is reversed.

Movius v. United States, 118 F. 1022, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 5247 (circtsdny 1902).

Pincite

118 F. 1022 (Movius v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related