Movers v. State

226 A.D.2d 616, 641 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4433

Opinion

In a claim pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6), the defendant appeals from an order of the Court [617] of Claims (Mega, J.), dated December 5, 1994, which granted the claimant’s motion for leave to file a late claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We reject the defendant’s contention that the claimant must litigate this dispute, which arose from a written contract to perform services, in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (see, Court of Claims Act § 9 [2]; Granger & Sons v Comptroller of State of N. Y., 220 AD2d 945; May v State of New York, 86 AD2d 898, affd 57 NY2d 505; Matter of Dominick Dan Alonzo, Inc. v State of New York, 73 AD2d 760; cf., Matter of Rye Psychiatric Hosp. Ctr. v State of New York, 177 AD2d 834; Sidoti v State of New York, 115 AD2d 202). Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Movers v. State, 226 A.D.2d 616, 641 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

226 A.D.2d 616 (Movers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Carey
443 N.E.2d 464 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Dominick Dan Alonzo, Inc. v. State
73 A.D.2d 760 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Clayborn v. New York State Board of Parole
86 A.D.2d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Sidoti v. State
115 A.D.2d 202 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. State
177 A.D.2d 834 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
R.W. Granger & Sons, Inc. v. Comptroller
220 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)