Move Organization v. Malmed
This text of 555 F. Supp. 683 (Move Organization v. Malmed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
The Move Organization brings this civil rights action against Philadelphia Common Pleas Judge Maimed, the City of Philadelphia, and the State of Pennsylvania over Judge Malmed’s conduct of a trial which resulted in the conviction of nine Move members. The complaint is utterly frivolous, inter alia, because: (1) Judge Maimed has absolute immunity, (2) the state has eleventh-amendment immunity; (3) the only allegations concerning the city and state are that they have “corporate links” to Judge Maimed and enforced judgment; (4) the judgment collectively estops Move.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 F. Supp. 683, 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/move-organization-v-malmed-paed-1983.