Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.

259 So. 3d 1083
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 28, 2018·No. CA 18-173 consolidated with CA 18-169·Published

Opinion

Robert E. Landry, Patrick D. Gallaugher, Kevin P. Fontenot, Scofield, Gerard, Pohorelsky, Gallaugher & Landry, 901 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 900, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 433-9436, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation

Craig Isenberg, Kyle W. Siegel, Joshua O. Cox, Barrasso Usdin Kupperman Freeman & Sarver, LLC, 909 Poydras, 24th Floor, New Orleans, LA 70112, (504) 589-9700, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT APPELLANT: Citgo Petroleum Corporation

Wells T. Watson, Jake D. Buford, Baggett, McCall, Burgess, Watson & Gaughan, P.O. Drawer 7820, Lake Charles, LA 70606-7820, (337) 478-8888, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Leslie Mouton

Richard Elliott Wilson, Somer G. Brown, Cox, Cox, Filo, Camel & Wilson, LLC, 723 Broad Street, Lake Charles, LA 70601, (337) 436-6611, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE: Leslie Mouton

Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, John D. Saunders, and Elizabeth A. Pickett, Judges.

COOKS, Judge.

For the reasons assigned by this court in Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp. , 18-169 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/28/18), --- So.3d ----, the judgment of the trial court awarding Leslie Mouton $10,000.00 in damages for fear of developing disease is reversed. In all other respects, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, AND RENDERED.

Pickett, J. concurs in part and dissents in part for the reasons assigned in 18-169, Bowling v. CITGO Petroleum Corp.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 259 So. 3d 1083 (La. Ct. App. 2018).

259 So. 3d 1083 (Mouton v. Citgo Petroleum Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guinn v. Kemp
136 So. 764 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1931)