Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine
675 N.E.2d 780, 424 Mass. 1014, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 41
Opinion
There was substantial evidence that supported the board’s decision. The doctor challenges the credibility of the complaining patient, an issue for the administrative magistrate and not for this court. The single justice adequately dealt with the doctor’s various contentions. There is no reason for this court to repeat his analysis.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 675 N.E.2d 780, 424 Mass. 1014, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 41 (Mass. 1997).
675 N.E.2d 780 (Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sears v. Board of Registration
680 N.E.2d 1172 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1997)