Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine
675 N.E.2d 780, 424 Mass. 1014, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 41
This text of 675 N.E.2d 780 (Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Moustafa v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 675 N.E.2d 780, 424 Mass. 1014, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 41 (Mass. 1997).
Opinion
There was substantial evidence that supported the board’s decision. The doctor challenges the credibility of the complaining patient, an issue for the administrative magistrate and not for this court. The single justice adequately dealt with the doctor’s various contentions. There is no reason for this court to repeat his analysis.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Sears v. Board of Registration
680 N.E.2d 1172 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
675 N.E.2d 780, 424 Mass. 1014, 1997 Mass. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moustafa-v-board-of-registration-in-medicine-mass-1997.