Moussier v. Gustine
This text of 25 La. Ann. 36 (Moussier v. Gustine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The plaintiffs injoined the execution of a judgment against them for $1850. The injunction was dissolved with twenty per cent, damages and they have appealed.
The defendants move to dismiss the appeal because the bond is not sufficient in amount; because the surety on the appeal bond is the same person who was surety on the injunction bond, and because the latter is not made party to the appeal.
[37]*37The appeal was taken by motion and the appeal bond is in favor of the clerk. All parties are therefore before the court.
The appeal bond being for $2000 is ample for a suspensive appeal.
The injunction bond was given to protect the defendants from damages resulting from the injunction, the amount of which decreed by the court is only $370.
That the surety on the injunction bond is the security on the appeal bond is of no consequence; he was not condemned to pay anything and he is not an appellant. 12 La. 383; 2 R. 235.
The motion is therefore denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 La. Ann. 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/moussier-v-gustine-la-1873.