Moussier v. Gustine

25 La. Ann. 36
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 15, 1873·No. No. 3886·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

Wyly, J.

The plaintiffs injoined the execution of a judgment against them for $1850. The injunction was dissolved with twenty per cent, damages and they have appealed.

The defendants move to dismiss the appeal because the bond is not sufficient in amount; because the surety on the appeal bond is the same person who was surety on the injunction bond, and because the latter is not made party to the appeal.

[37] The appeal was taken by motion and the appeal bond is in favor of the clerk. All parties are therefore before the court.

The appeal bond being for $2000 is ample for a suspensive appeal.

The injunction bond was given to protect the defendants from damages resulting from the injunction, the amount of which decreed by the court is only $370.

That the surety on the injunction bond is the security on the appeal bond is of no consequence; he was not condemned to pay anything and he is not an appellant. 12 La. 383; 2 R. 235.

The motion is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moussier v. Gustine, 25 La. Ann. 36 (La. 1873).

25 La. Ann. 36 (Moussier v. Gustine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Denekamp v. Heisler
126 So. 447 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1930)
Fabacher v. Rouprich
2 La. App. 138 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1925)
Watts v. Collier
72 So. 822 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1914)
M. M. Sanders & Son v. Schilling
49 So. 689 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1909)