Mouser, William Thomas
This text of Mouser, William Thomas (Mouser, William Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS
ANDERSON COUNTY
Per curiam. KEASLER and HERVEY, JJ., dissent.The petition for discretionary review violates Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.5, because the grounds and reasons for review are longer than 15 pages.
The petition is struck. See Rule of Appellate Procedure 68.6.
The petitioner may redraw the petition. The redrawn petition must be filed in the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS within thirty days after the date of this order.
En banc
Filed: December 12, 2007
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mouser, William Thomas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouser-william-thomas-texcrimapp-2007.