Mousen Yisak Aden v. United States

• Court: District Court, District of Columbia
• Decided: March 11, 2025
• Docket: Civil Action No. 2025-0245
• Status: Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOUSEN YISAK ADEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 25-0245 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

application, his pro se complaint, and motions for injunctive relief. It appears that plaintiff, the

supposed “Raymon Roman the chief Deusch who[] owns the office [of] the royal priesthood,”

Compl. at 5, attempts to bring this action on behalf of his “client and adherent Prince [C]onley

Fair,” id. The purported cause of action pertains to “the economic structure of the world banks,”

id. at 4, which allegedly have been “taken over by jews that are cousins to the arabians that have

the oil,” id., and “hand in hand they control world economics,” id. Plaintiff is “not happy about

it.” Id. Among other relief, plaintiff demands a “restraining order for Donald [T]rump and the

Jewish ran Us Military to let us get our shit together and put where we put.” Id. at 5. He also

demands that the former and current Presidents of the United States “inform International

[M]onetary Fund to open” an account for him. Id.

Under the statute governing in forma pauperis proceedings, the Court is required to

dismiss a case “at any time” it determines that the action is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Because the instant complaint

falls far short of stating a viable claim, it is subject to dismissal. See McGuire v. U.S. District

Court, No. 10-cv-0696, 2010 WL 1855858, at *1 (D.D.C. May 4, 2010) (summarily dismissing 1 complaint under § 1915(e)(2) because it was “largely incoherent and nonsensical”); cf. Neitzke v.

Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (“[A] complaint, containing . . . factual allegations and legal

conclusions . . . lack[ing] an arguable basis either in law or in fact” shall be dismissed.).

The Court will grant plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis [2], dismiss the

complaint without prejudice, and deny as moot plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief [4] [13]

[21]. A separate order will issue.

DATE: March 10, 2025 /s/ CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER United States District Judge