Mouse v. Central Sav. & Tr. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Mouse v. Central Sav. & Tr. Co.

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 17, 1927

DocketNo. 20331

StatusPublished

This text of 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251 (Mouse v. Central Sav. & Tr. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mouse v. Central Sav. & Tr. Co., 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251 (Ohio 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Gordon Mouse contends in the Supreme Court, that a bank which by its negligence caused a misspelling of his name and then refused to honor his checks as a depositor and caused his arrest charging fraud, is liable in damages; and that a reviewing court cannot upon finding prejudicial error upon the face of the record, modify a money judgment and reduce same to nominal sum without his consent.

Note — Motion to certify allowed, 5 Abs. 171.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon Mouse contends in the Supreme Court, that a bank which by its negligence caused a misspelling of his name and then refused to honor his checks as a depositor and caused his arrest charging fraud, is liable in damages; and that a reviewing court cannot upon finding prejudicial error upon the face of the record, modify a money judgment and reduce same to nominal sum without his consent.

Note — Motion to certify allowed, 5 Abs. 171.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 Ohio Law. Abs. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouse-v-central-sav-tr-co-ohio-1927.