Mourning v. Target Corp.

Fourth Circuit

Mourning v. Target Corp.

333 F. App'x 785

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 23, 2009·No. No. 09-1147·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished by PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this personal injury action, Josephine P. Mourning appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Target Corporation and the denial of Mourning’s motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mourning v. Target Corp., No. 8:07-cv-03212-PJM (D.Md. Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished by PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this personal injury action, Josephine P. Mourning appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Target Corporation and the denial of Mourning’s motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mourning v. Target Corp., No. 8:07-cv-03212-PJM (D.Md. Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mourning v. Target Corp., 333 F. App'x 785 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 785 (Mourning v. Target Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.