Mourning v. Target Corp.

333 F. App'x 785
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2009
DocketNo. 09-1147
StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 785 (Mourning v. Target Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mourning v. Target Corp., 333 F. App'x 785 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished by PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In this personal injury action, Josephine P. Mourning appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Target Corporation and the denial of Mourning’s motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mourning v. Target Corp., No. 8:07-cv-03212-PJM (D.Md. Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 F. App'x 785, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mourning-v-target-corp-ca4-2009.