Mouriz v. Farulla

101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 4, 1958
DocketNo. 57-367
StatusPublished

This text of 101 So. 2d 168 (Mouriz v. Farulla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mouriz v. Farulla, 101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs who have appealed. Appellants’ brief and oral argument are not directed to the question of liability, but urge errors solely concerned with the size of the verdict. A careful review of the record in the light of the assignments of error reveals that the jury could have reached the verdict returned upon the basis of their evaluation of the testimony based upon the credibility of the witnesses. See Tooley v. Marguilies, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 421.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tooley v. Margulies
79 So. 2d 421 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouriz-v-farulla-fladistctapp-1958.