Mouriz v. Farulla
This text of 101 So. 2d 168 (Mouriz v. Farulla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs who have appealed. Appellants’ brief and oral argument are not directed to the question of liability, but urge errors solely concerned with the size of the verdict. A careful review of the record in the light of the assignments of error reveals that the jury could have reached the verdict returned upon the basis of their evaluation of the testimony based upon the credibility of the witnesses. See Tooley v. Marguilies, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 421.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouriz-v-farulla-fladistctapp-1958.