Mouriz v. Farulla

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mouriz v. Farulla

101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 4, 1958·No. No. 57-367·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

A jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs who have appealed. Appellants’ brief and oral argument are not directed to the question of liability, but urge errors solely concerned with the size of the verdict. A careful review of the record in the light of the assignments of error reveals that the jury could have reached the verdict returned upon the basis of their evaluation of the testimony based upon the credibility of the witnesses. See Tooley v. Marguilies, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 421.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

A jury trial resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs who have appealed. Appellants’ brief and oral argument are not directed to the question of liability, but urge errors solely concerned with the size of the verdict. A careful review of the record in the light of the assignments of error reveals that the jury could have reached the verdict returned upon the basis of their evaluation of the testimony based upon the credibility of the witnesses. See Tooley v. Marguilies, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 421.

Affirmed.

CARROLL, CHAS., C. J., and HORTON and PEARSON, JJ., concur.

Mouriz v. Farulla, 101 So. 2d 168, 1958 Fla. App. LEXIS 2682 (Fla. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

101 So. 2d 168 (Mouriz v. Farulla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related