Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

1 A.D.2d 767, 148 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 A.D.2d 767 (Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 1 A.D.2d 767, 148 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

We find that the judgment entered herein by the court below sitting without a jury is sustained by the record, except for the damages awarded, which are excessive. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is modified pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 584 of the Civil Practice Act by reducing the award for plaintiff wife to $6,000 and for plaintiff husband to $3,000 and, as so modified, affirmed (see Leonard v. Frantz Co., 268 App. Div. 144, 148). Concur— Peck, P. J., Botein, Frank and Bergan, JJ.; Cox, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint upon the ground that a prima facie case was not established. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hollinger v. SHOPPERS PARADISE OF NJ, INC.
361 A.2d 578 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 A.D.2d 767, 148 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouren-v-great-atlantic-pacific-tea-co-nyappdiv-1956.