Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

1 A.D.2d 767, 148 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1956·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We find that the judgment entered herein by the court below sitting without a jury is sustained by the record, except for the damages awarded, which are excessive. Accordingly the judgment appealed from is modified pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 584 of the Civil Practice Act by reducing the award for plaintiff wife to $6,000 and for plaintiff husband to $3,000 and, as so modified, affirmed (see Leonard v. Frantz Co., 268 App. Div. 144, 148). Concur— Peck, P. J., Botein, Frank and Bergan, JJ.; Cox, J., dissents and votes to reverse and dismiss the complaint upon the ground that a prima facie case was not established. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 1 A.D.2d 767, 148 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6571 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

1 A.D.2d 767 (Mouren v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hollinger v. SHOPPERS PARADISE OF NJ, INC.
361 A.2d 578 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)