Mountz v. Jones
17 F. Cas. 928, 1 Cranch 212
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedDecember 15, 1804
StatusPublished
This text of 17 F. Cas. 928 (Mountz v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mountz v. Jones, 17 F. Cas. 928, 1 Cranch 212 (circtddc 1804).
Opinion
were of opinion, that the plea was bad, because a copy was not set up at the door of the county jail, but only at the corporation jail.
ICILTX, Chief Judge, thought, also, that the county justices had no authority to command the corporation sheriff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
17 F. Cas. 928, 1 Cranch 212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mountz-v-jones-circtddc-1804.