Mountjoy v. Banks's

Supreme Court of Virginia

Mountjoy v. Banks's

6 Va. 387

DecidedApril 16, 1819

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Va. 387 (Mountjoy v. Banks's) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mountjoy v. Banks's, 6 Va. 387 (Va. 1819).

Pincite

Opinion

Judge R0ANE

pronounced this ComlPs opinion.

The Court is of opInu~n that, from the nature of the demand, as disclosed in the bffl~ and supported by the testimony, the case was proper for the jurisdiction of a Court of Chancery; and that therefore the decree disiuisshig the bill is erroneous. The decree is therefore reversed, with Costs, atid the cause remanded, in order to a final decree upon the incrils.-~

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judge R0ANE

pronounced this ComlPs opinion.

The Court is of opInu~n that, from the nature of the demand, as disclosed in the bffl~ and supported by the testimony, the case was proper for the jurisdiction of a Court of Chancery; and that therefore the decree disiuisshig the bill is erroneous. The decree is therefore reversed, with Costs, atid the cause remanded, in order to a final decree upon the incrils.-~

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Va. 387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mountjoy-v-bankss-va-1819.