Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.

647 F. App'x 211

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 28, 2016·No. No. 15-2381·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

. AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charlotte D. Mountcastle appeals the district court’s order dismissing her amended complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., No. 2:15-cv-00170-RBS-RJK (E.D.Va. Oct. 19, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

. AFFIRMED.

Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc., 647 F. App'x 211 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

647 F. App'x 211 (Mountcastle v. Premier Auto Brokers Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.