Mountain View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Bomersbach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Mountain View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Bomersbach

744 A.2d 1285

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mountain View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Bomersbach. Read the opinion of the Court — 564 Pa. 433 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 9, 2000·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9 th day of February, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED.

The parties are further directed to address the issue of whether the findings in the Opinion of the trial court dated August 28, 1995, that the fees claimed by the Association were unconscionable and against public policy, had any binding effect on the second trial court, which heard the matter after remand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 9 th day of February, 2000, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby GRANTED.

The parties are further directed to address the issue of whether the findings in the Opinion of the trial court dated August 28, 1995, that the fees claimed by the Association were unconscionable and against public policy, had any binding effect on the second trial court, which heard the matter after remand.

Mountain View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Bomersbach, 744 A.2d 1285 (Pa. 2000).

Pincite

744 A.2d 1285 (Mountain View Condominium Owners Ass'n v. Bomersbach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.