Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie

247 A.D. 898

This text of 247 A.D. 898 (Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie, 247 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

In an action to recover a balance due upon a promissory note payable on demand, order in so far as it denies the motion of defendant Peddrick for summary judgment dismissing the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal, with the following memorandum: There is no issue of fact. Plaintiff’s affiant does not speak with knowledge. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267.) Deposit of collateral is not a payment. It may be an acknowledgment of a debt from which a promise to pay might be implied; but that must be in writing. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 59.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Curry v. MacKenzie
146 N.E. 375 (New York Court of Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-vernon-trust-co-v-delanoie-nyappdiv-1936.