Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie

247 A.D. 898

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover a balance due upon a promissory note payable on demand, order in so far as it denies the motion of defendant Peddrick for summary judgment dismissing the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal, with the following memorandum: There is no issue of fact. Plaintiff’s affiant does not speak with knowledge. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267.) Deposit of collateral is not a payment. It may be an acknowledgment of a debt from which a promise to pay might be implied; but that must be in writing. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 59.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover a balance due upon a promissory note payable on demand, order in so far as it denies the motion of defendant Peddrick for summary judgment dismissing the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents and votes for reversal, with the following memorandum: There is no issue of fact. Plaintiff’s affiant does not speak with knowledge. (Curry v. Mackenzie, 239 N. Y. 267.) Deposit of collateral is not a payment. It may be an acknowledgment of a debt from which a promise to pay might be implied; but that must be in writing. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 59.)

Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie, 247 A.D. 898 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

247 A.D. 898 (Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. Delanoie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related