Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Morris

884 A.2d 1027, 276 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 523
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedOctober 6, 2005
DocketSC 17517
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 884 A.2d 1027 (Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Morris, 884 A.2d 1027, 276 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 523 (Colo. 2005).

Opinion

The petition by the intervening plaintiff, Jane Doe, for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 90 Conn. App. 525 (AC 25619), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court’s summary judgment for the plaintiff with respect to the claim of coverage for child molestation by an employee of Pediatric Day and Night Care, LLC?”

[908]*908The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17517. Decided October 6, 2005 Kevin E. Creed, in support of the petition.

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. Morris
917 A.2d 538 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
884 A.2d 1027, 276 Conn. 907, 2005 Conn. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-vernon-fire-insurance-v-morris-conn-2005.