Mount v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mount v. State

796 So. 2d 565, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12086, 2001 WL 969389

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 27, 2001

DocketNo. 1D01-2450

StatusPublished

This text of 796 So. 2d 565 (Mount v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mount v. State, 796 So. 2d 565, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12086, 2001 WL 969389 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 16, 2001, the Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction. Because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not authorized, rendition of the underlying order was not delayed. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Consequently, the notice of appeal was not [566]*566timely filed. The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

MINER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of July 16, 2001, the Court has determined that it does not have jurisdiction. Because the appellant’s motion for rehearing was not authorized, rendition of the underlying order was not delayed. See Griffis v. State, 593 So.2d 308 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Consequently, the notice of appeal was not [566]*566timely filed. The appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

MINER, DAVIS, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

796 So. 2d 565, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 12086, 2001 WL 969389, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack