Mount v. Mount

New York Court of Chancery

Mount v. Mount

11 Paige Ch. 383, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 230

DecidedDecember 3, 1844

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Paige Ch. 383 (Mount v. Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mount v. Mount, 11 Paige Ch. 383, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 230 (N.Y. 1844).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancellor

decided that, under the existing laws' relative to the exemption of property from execution, a person who was not worth more than $250 was not good security for costs. He said that where a bond for costs in the penalty of $250 was required, the sureties, respectively, should be required to justify in double- that amount-; to render it probable- that the amount of the penalty of the bond could be collected of either or both of the sureties upon execution.

Order accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancellor

decided that, under the existing laws' relative to the exemption of property from execution, a person who was not worth more than $250 was not good security for costs. He said that where a bond for costs in the penalty of $250 was required, the sureties, respectively, should be required to justify in double- that amount-; to render it probable- that the amount of the penalty of the bond could be collected of either or both of the sureties upon execution.

Order accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Paige Ch. 383, 1844 N.Y. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-v-mount-nychanct-1844.