Mount v. DCBS
Opinion
FILED: October 4, 2001
In the Matter of the Compensation of
Cindy Mount, Claimant.
CINDY M. MOUNT,
Petitioner on Review,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER
AND
BUSINESS SERVICES
and SAIF CORPORATION,
Respondents on Review.
On petition for review filed July 12, 2001.*
Christopher D. Moore, Eugene, filed the petition for petitioner on review.
No appearance contra.
Before Carson, Chief Justice, and Gillette, Durham, Leeson, Riggs, and De Muniz, Justices.**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further consideration in light of Koskela v. Willamette Industries, Inc., 331 Or 362, 15 P3d 548 (2000).
*Judicial Review from the Workers' Compensation Board. 161 Or App 664, 986 P2d 28 (1999).
**Balmer, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mount v. DCBS (Mount v. DCBS) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.