Mount Sinai Hospital v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

291 A.D.2d 536, 738 N.Y.S.2d 247, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1957
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 291 A.D.2d 536 (Mount Sinai Hospital v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mount Sinai Hospital v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp., 291 A.D.2d 536, 738 N.Y.S.2d 247, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action by the assignees of no-fault claims for, inter alia, reimbursement of medical bills to recover unpaid no-fault benefits, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Segal, J.), dated October 3, 2001, as granted those branches of the defendant’s motion which were to sever seven causes of action asserted by the plaintiffs.

Ordered that the order is modified by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the motion which was to sever the third and fourth causes of action from each other, and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

In the third and fourth causes of action, the plaintiff St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, as assignee of the patient Oneather Harvey, seeks to recover no-fault benefits for medical expenses attributable to an accident occurring on March 30, 2000. Since those causes of action involve one assignee and apparently one accident, they were properly joined pursuant to CPLR 1002 (see, Hempstead Gen. Hosp. v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 134 AD2d 569, 570).

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in severing the remaining five causes of action, asserting claims on behalf of five unrelated assignees, involved in accidents on five different dates, with no common contract of insurance and no relation or similarity to each other, other than the fact that the no-fault benefits were not paid (cf., Hempstead Gen. Hosp. [537]*537v Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., supra at 570). Santucci, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Colin Clarke, M.D., P.C. v. MVAIC
72 Misc. 3d 136(A) (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Belair Care Ctr., Inc. v. Cool Insuring Agency, Inc.
2020 NY Slip Op 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Global Liberty Ins. Co. v. Tyrell
2019 NY Slip Op 3691 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Annette Medical, P.C. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
17 Misc. 3d 583 (Nassau County District Court, 2007)
Carothers v. GEICO Indemnity Co.
14 Misc. 3d 92 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Poole v. Allstate Insurance
20 A.D.3d 518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Radiology Resource Network, P.C. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
12 A.D.3d 185 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
291 A.D.2d 536, 738 N.Y.S.2d 247, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mount-sinai-hospital-v-motor-vehicle-accident-indemnification-corp-nyappdiv-2002.