Moulton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Moulton v. State

1953 OK CR 93, 258 P.2d 1207, 97 Okla. Crim. 110, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 240

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Moulton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 93 Okla. Crim. 324 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided July 1, 1953·No. No. A-11856·Published

Opinion

POWELL, P. J.

The appeal of William (Bill) Moulton from a judgment entered by Judge Edmister, judge of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, after a plea of guilty on the charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and assessing a fine of $150 and sixty days imprisonment in the county jail, must fail.

The sole ground for reversal in the petition in error is that the judgment and sentence is excessive.

No brief has been filed, and no appearance was made on the 10th day of June, 1953, when the case came on for oral argument. No error is apparent.

The judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POWELL, P. J.

The appeal of William (Bill) Moulton from a judgment entered by Judge Edmister, judge of the court of common pleas of Tulsa county, after a plea of guilty on the charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and assessing a fine of $150 and sixty days imprisonment in the county jail, must fail.

The sole ground for reversal in the petition in error is that the judgment and sentence is excessive.

No brief has been filed, and no appearance was made on the 10th day of June, 1953, when the case came on for oral argument. No error is apparent.

The judgment and sentence appealed from is affirmed.

JONES and BRETT, JJ. concur.

Moulton v. State, 1953 OK CR 93, 258 P.2d 1207, 97 Okla. Crim. 110, 1953 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 240 (Okla. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

1953 OK CR 93 (Moulton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.