Moulton v. State
69 S.E. 32, 8 Ga. App. 380, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 172
Opinion
No error of law appears. The evidence of guilt was weak and unsatisfactory, but there were some circumstances from which the jury might reasonably have inferred guilt, and these circumstances were not satisfactorily explained by the defendant. The verdict was approved by the trial judge, and this court can not interfere.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Moulton v. State, 69 S.E. 32, 8 Ga. App. 380, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 172 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
69 S.E. 32 (Moulton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.