Mould v. Brauen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mould v. Brauen

3 A.D.2d 646, 157 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3482

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 20, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 3 A.D.2d 646 (Mould v. Brauen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mould v. Brauen, 3 A.D.2d 646, 157 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment in favor of plaintiff Edward B. Mould affirmed. Order modified to grant a new trial unless defendants stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of Robert Mould, an infant, to the sum of $3,500 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event judgment is to be entered accordingly, and as so modified the [647]*647order is affirmed on the ground that the verdict of the jury was inadequate, with costs of this appeal to plaintiffs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff Edward B. Mould, in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order of the same court and Justice, severing the causes of action and directing entry of a judgment in favor of plaintiff Edward B. Mould in the amount of the verdict and granting a motion in behalf of the infant plaintiff Robert Mould to set aside the jury’s verdict in his favor as inadequate and for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment in favor of plaintiff Edward B. Mould affirmed. Order modified to grant a new trial unless defendants stipulate to increase the verdict in favor of Robert Mould, an infant, to the sum of $3,500 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event judgment is to be entered accordingly, and as so modified the [647]*647order is affirmed on the ground that the verdict of the jury was inadequate, with costs of this appeal to plaintiffs. All concur. (Appeal from a judgment of Erie Trial Term for plaintiff Edward B. Mould, in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order of the same court and Justice, severing the causes of action and directing entry of a judgment in favor of plaintiff Edward B. Mould in the amount of the verdict and granting a motion in behalf of the infant plaintiff Robert Mould to set aside the jury’s verdict in his favor as inadequate and for a new trial.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Williams and Bastow, JJ. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 A.D.2d 646, 157 N.Y.S.2d 1014, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mould-v-brauen-nyappdiv-1956.