Mouheb v. Hall, No. 31 79 61 (Apr. 10, 1995)
This text of 1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3753 (Mouheb v. Hall, No. 31 79 61 (Apr. 10, 1995)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants which result was justified either in a finding the defendants were not legally liable or that the plaintiff himself was comparatively negligent to the extent of 51% or more based upon the evidence and applicable rules of law. No exceptions were taken to the court's charge.
The resolution of factual issues may not be disturbed by the court. CT Page 3754
With respect to the admissibilities of entries in the hospital record referencing presence of alcohol in the plaintiff's blood, the court found as preliminary question of fact said entries were relevant to the issue of proper diagnosis. D'Amato v. Johnson,
Motion to Set Aside the Verdict is denied.
John C. Flanagan State Trial Referee
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1995 Conn. Super. Ct. 3753, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouheb-v-hall-no-31-79-61-apr-10-1995-connsuperct-1995.