Mouazeb v. Fargesen
This text of Mouazeb v. Fargesen (Mouazeb v. Fargesen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EMILIO HABIB MOUAZEB,
Plaintiff, 21-CV-9226 (JPO) -v-
VITALY FARGESEN, et al, Defendants.
STANDMILL S.R.O,
Plaintiff, 22-CV-1537 (JPO)
-v-
VITALY FARGESEN, et al, ORDER Defendants.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The motion to consolidate these cases is hereby granted. All future filings relating to either case shall be filed in the lead case, 21-CV-9226. All counsel in 22-CV-1537 shall file appearances in 21-CV-9226 within 7 days. Despite such consolidation, the consolidated cases “retain their separate identities,” Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1128-31 (2018), and this order does not affect the rights of the parties in either of the consolidated cases. The scheduling order entered on June 28, 2022, in 21-CV-9226 shall govern both consolidated cases. For administrative purposes, the Clerk of Court is directed to close 22-CV-1537. The Clerk is also directed to close the motion at Docket Number 827 in 21-CV-9226. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2022 New York, New York
| J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mouazeb v. Fargesen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mouazeb-v-fargesen-nysd-2022.