Mouazeb v. Fargesen

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 13, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-09226·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

EMILIO HABIB MOUAZEB,

Plaintiff, 21-CV-9226 (JPO) -v-

VITALY FARGESEN, et al, Defendants.

STANDMILL S.R.O,

Plaintiff, 22-CV-1537 (JPO)

-v-

VITALY FARGESEN, et al, ORDER Defendants.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The motion to consolidate these cases is hereby granted. All future filings relating to either case shall be filed in the lead case, 21-CV-9226. All counsel in 22-CV-1537 shall file appearances in 21-CV-9226 within 7 days. Despite such consolidation, the consolidated cases “retain their separate identities,” Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1128-31 (2018), and this order does not affect the rights of the parties in either of the consolidated cases. The scheduling order entered on June 28, 2022, in 21-CV-9226 shall govern both consolidated cases. For administrative purposes, the Clerk of Court is directed to close 22-CV-1537. The Clerk is also directed to close the motion at Docket Number 827 in 21-CV-9226. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2022 New York, New York

J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mouazeb v. Fargesen, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Mouazeb v. Fargesen (Mouazeb v. Fargesen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hall v. Hall
584 U.S. 59 (Supreme Court, 2018)