Mouazeb v. Fargesen
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EMILIO HABIB MOUAZEB,
Plaintiff, 21-CV-9226 (JPO) -v-
VITALY FARGESEN, et al, Defendants.
STANDMILL S.R.O,
Plaintiff, 22-CV-1537 (JPO)
-v-
VITALY FARGESEN, et al, ORDER Defendants.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The motion to consolidate these cases is hereby granted. All future filings relating to either case shall be filed in the lead case, 21-CV-9226. All counsel in 22-CV-1537 shall file appearances in 21-CV-9226 within 7 days. Despite such consolidation, the consolidated cases “retain their separate identities,” Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1128-31 (2018), and this order does not affect the rights of the parties in either of the consolidated cases. The scheduling order entered on June 28, 2022, in 21-CV-9226 shall govern both consolidated cases. For administrative purposes, the Clerk of Court is directed to close 22-CV-1537. The Clerk is also directed to close the motion at Docket Number 827 in 21-CV-9226. SO ORDERED. Dated: October 13, 2022 New York, New York
J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mouazeb v. Fargesen (Mouazeb v. Fargesen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.