Motz v. Motz
79 A. 686, 76 N.J. Eq. 609, 6 Buchanan 609, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 259
This text of 79 A. 686 (Motz v. Motz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Motz v. Motz, 79 A. 686, 76 N.J. Eq. 609, 6 Buchanan 609, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1910).
Opinion
The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the court below.
[610]*610For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—-15.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
79 A. 686, 76 N.J. Eq. 609, 6 Buchanan 609, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motz-v-motz-nj-1910.