Home/Supreme Court of New Jersey/Motz v. Motz

Motz v. Motz

79 A. 686, 76 N.J. Eq. 609, 6 Buchanan 609, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 259
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 28, 1910·Published

Opinion

Pee Cukiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Stevens in the court below.

[610]*610For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Yoorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Gray, Dill, Congdon—-15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motz v. Motz, 79 A. 686, 76 N.J. Eq. 609, 6 Buchanan 609, 1910 N.J. LEXIS 259 (N.J. 1910).

79 A. 686 (Motz v. Motz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.