Motty Eitington, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Motty Eitington, Inc. v. United States

32 Cust. Ct. 387, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1790

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 28, 1954

DocketNo. 57809; protests 214797-K, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 32 Cust. Ct. 387 (Motty Eitington, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motty Eitington, Inc. v. United States, 32 Cust. Ct. 387, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1790 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. i Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred. i Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

32 Cust. Ct. 387, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motty-eitington-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack