Motte v. Inglis

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Motte v. Inglis

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 626

CourtCourt of Chancery of South Carolina

DecidedJuly 1, 1774

StatusPublished

This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 626 (Motte v. Inglis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motte v. Inglis, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 626 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1774).

Pincite

Opinion

1777. Bill seeks to have defendants consent to conveyance of real estate which should come to plaintiff as part of his wife’s inheritance from her father, David [627]*627Deas. Answer of Inglis admits plaintiff’s claim under marriage articles, but declares .property in question was left to plaintiff’s late wife, Mary, to defendant’s wife, and to Elizabeth Deas by their mother, and therefore the defendants are heirs at law to plaintiff’s wife and entitled to the whole property in question. [Remainder of decree lost.]

(Bundle 1770-)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1777. Bill seeks to have defendants consent to conveyance of real estate which should come to plaintiff as part of his wife’s inheritance from her father, David [627]*627Deas. Answer of Inglis admits plaintiff’s claim under marriage articles, but declares .property in question was left to plaintiff’s late wife, Mary, to defendant’s wife, and to Elizabeth Deas by their mother, and therefore the defendants are heirs at law to plaintiff’s wife and entitled to the whole property in question. [Remainder of decree lost.]

(Bundle 1770-)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motte-v-inglis-ctchansc-1774.