Mott v. Rutter

57 A. 1132, 66 N.J. Eq. 435, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 198
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 29, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 57 A. 1132 (Mott v. Rutter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mott v. Rutter, 57 A. 1132, 66 N.J. Eq. 435, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 198 (N.J. 1904).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Grey rendered in the court of chancery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Dixok, Garrisok, Port, Hekdricksok, Pitkey, Swayze, Bogert, Vredekburgh, Vroom, Greek, Gray — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 A. 1132, 66 N.J. Eq. 435, 1904 N.J. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-rutter-nj-1904.