Mott v. . Mott
87 N.E. 1114, 194 N.Y. 521, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1319
This text of 87 N.E. 1114 (Mott v. . Mott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mott v. . Mott, 87 N.E. 1114, 194 N.Y. 521, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1319 (N.Y. 1909).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: EDWARD T. BARTLETT, VANN, WILLARD BARTLETT and HISCOCK, JJ. Dissenting: CULLEN, Ch. J., and GRAY, J. Absent: WERNER, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 N.E. 1114, 194 N.Y. 521, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-mott-ny-1909.