Mott v. Hurd

1 Root 73
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided August 15, 1775·Published

Opinion

[75] In tliis case there was no written note or memorandum of tlie agreement and promise. A motion in arrest was made, 1st, That tlie parol agreement was absorbed by tlie giving of tlie deed; 2d, No time is set or person appointed, when, and by whom said land should be measured; 3d, That a special notice and request was necessary to entitle the plaintiff to an action, which is not laid in the declaration to have been given or made.

The court determined the motion to be insufficient and the plaintiff had judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mott v. Hurd, 1 Root 73 (Colo. Ct. App. 1775).

1 Root 73 (Mott v. Hurd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.