Mott v. Hurd

Connecticut Superior Court

Mott v. Hurd

1 Root 73

DecidedAugust 15, 1775

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 73 (Mott v. Hurd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mott v. Hurd, 1 Root 73 (Colo. Ct. App. 1775).

Pincite

Opinion

[75]*75In tliis case there was no written note or memorandum of tlie agreement and promise. A motion in arrest was made, 1st, That tlie parol agreement was absorbed by tlie giving of tlie deed; 2d, No time is set or person appointed, when, and by whom said land should be measured; 3d, That a special notice and request was necessary to entitle the plaintiff to an action, which is not laid in the declaration to have been given or made.

The court determined the motion to be insufficient and the plaintiff had judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[75]*75In tliis case there was no written note or memorandum of tlie agreement and promise. A motion in arrest was made, 1st, That tlie parol agreement was absorbed by tlie giving of tlie deed; 2d, No time is set or person appointed, when, and by whom said land should be measured; 3d, That a special notice and request was necessary to entitle the plaintiff to an action, which is not laid in the declaration to have been given or made.

The court determined the motion to be insufficient and the plaintiff had judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-hurd-connsuperct-1775.