Mott v. Hill

7 Ga. 79
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1849·No. No. 13·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Warner, J..

[1.] There is.no judgment of'the Court below to be affirmed or reversed. The plaintiff in the Court below, as he had the' right to do, voluntarily dismissed his case. The case of Van Wormer vs. The Mayor, &c. of Albany, (18 Wendell, 169,) cited in support of the motion to dismiss the writ of error, is in point-Let the writ of error be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mott v. Hill, 7 Ga. 79 (Ga. 1849).

7 Ga. 79 (Mott v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lightsey v. Dixon
123 S.E.2d 827 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1962)
Walden v. Whitney Company
36 S.E.2d 157 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Holloway v. Dorsey
31 S.E.2d 349 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Griffin v. Securities Investment Co.
192 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
City of Jackson v. Hardy
180 S.E. 610 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1935)
Atlanta & West Point Railroad v. Golightly
97 S.E. 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)
Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil & Fertilizer Co.
57 S.E. 879 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)