Mott v. . Griffith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mott v. . Griffith

36 S.E. 1023, 126 N.C. 775, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 315

DecidedJune 5, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 36 S.E. 1023 (Mott v. . Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mott v. . Griffith, 36 S.E. 1023, 126 N.C. 775, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 315 (N.C. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

His Honor, upon consideration of facts agreed and submitted to him rendered judgment in favor of defendant E.A. Griffith, and the relator, M.L. Mott, excepted and appealed. From the facts agreed in this case it appears to us that the same questions of law are presented for our determination that were presented inWhite v. Murray, ante, 153, and this case is controlled by the opinion in that. The judgment of the court below that the plaintiff could not recover must be

Affirmed.

(776)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

His Honor, upon consideration of facts agreed and submitted to him rendered judgment in favor of defendant E.A. Griffith, and the relator, M.L. Mott, excepted and appealed. From the facts agreed in this case it appears to us that the same questions of law are presented for our determination that were presented inWhite v. Murray, ante, 153, and this case is controlled by the opinion in that. The judgment of the court below that the plaintiff could not recover must be

Affirmed.

(776)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 S.E. 1023, 126 N.C. 775, 1900 N.C. LEXIS 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-griffith-nc-1900.