Mott v. Clarke

56 P. 545, 6 Cal. Unrep. 244
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 7, 1899
DocketS. F. No. 783
StatusPublished

This text of 56 P. 545 (Mott v. Clarke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mott v. Clarke, 56 P. 545, 6 Cal. Unrep. 244 (Cal. 1899).

Opinion

PRINGLE, C.

This is an attempted appeal from an order, of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, made December 4, 1895, adjudging appellant “guilty of contempt, and that he be confined in the county jail twenty-four hours, and pay to Eli T. Sheppard two hundred and seventy-five dollars on or before December 6, 1895.” The order is not appealable: Ex parte Clancy, 90 Cal. 553, 27 Pac. 411; Cosby v. Superior Court, 110 Cal. 45, 42 Pac. 460. I advise that the appeal be dismissed.

We concur: Haynes, C.; Gray, C.

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex parte Clancy
27 P. 411 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Cosby v. Superior Court
42 P. 460 (California Supreme Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
56 P. 545, 6 Cal. Unrep. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-clarke-cal-1899.