Mott v. City and County of Honolulu
This text of Mott v. City and County of Honolulu (Mott v. City and County of Honolulu) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 07-OCT-2020 10:55 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
KAREN MOTT, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CIV. NO. 1CC181000829)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Wilson, JJ., and Circuit Judge Cataldo, assigned by reason of vacancy)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant’s Application for Writ
of Certiorari, filed on August 10, 2020, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, October 7, 2020.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
/s/ Lisa W. Cataldo
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mott v. City and County of Honolulu, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mott-v-city-and-county-of-honolulu-haw-2020.