Mott v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
164 N.C. 367
Opinions
There is ample evidence to sustain the plaintiff’s cause of action, and we find no error in the trial.
The verdict establishes the fact that the plaintiff was ejected from the train at a place forbidden by statute, and after the conductor had accepted and retained his ticket, and upon either ground the judgment should be affirmed.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mott v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad, 164 N.C. 367 (N.C. 1913).
164 N.C. 367 (Mott v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pickens v. Richmond & Danville Railroad
10 S.E. 556 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1889)