Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedFebruary 8, 2011

Docket2011-1142

StatusUnpublished

This text of Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc. (Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MOTOR WORKS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. SAFER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CERMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGE ACKERSON, MARY STRANAHAN, NICHOLAS STREIT, EDWARD HALBACH AN1) TIM STREIT, Defendan,ts-Appellants. 2011-1142 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Northern District of CaIifornia in case no. 08-CV-3608, Judge J ames Ware. ON MOTION ORDER The court considers whether this appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appea1s for the Ninth Circuit. Safer Technologies, Inc. et al. appeal from a judgment of the United StateS District Court for N0rthern District

MOTOR WORKS V. SAFER TECH 2 of California in a trademark infringement action. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Based upon our review, it does not appear that the dis- trict court‘s jurisdiction arose in whole or in part under the laws governing this court's appellate jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: Absent a response received by this court within 14 days of the date of filing of this order, this appeal will be transferred to the United States Cou1't of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. FOR THE COUs'r ' FEB 08 2011 lsi J an Horba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Robert C. Weems, Esq. J ames M. Hanavan, Esq. nmb 819 ""+&E'é‘§B€»fA’t°¢’iE"¢%"'.¥°“ ma rosa 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLEH(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedentia1. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit MOTOR WORKS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, V. SAFER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., CERMA TECHNOLOGY, INC., GEORGE ACKERSON, MARY STRANAHAN, NICHOLAS STREIT, EDWARD HALBACH AN1) TIM STREIT, Defendan,ts-Appellants. 2011-1142 Appea1 from the United States District Court for the Northern District of CaIifornia in case no. 08-CV-3608, Judge J ames Ware. ON MOTION ORDER The court considers whether this appeal should be transferred to the United States Court of Appea1s for the Ninth Circuit. Safer Technologies, Inc. et al. appeal from a judgment of the United StateS District Court for N0rthern District

MOTOR WORKS V. SAFER TECH 2 of California in a trademark infringement action. This court is a court of limited jurisdiction 28 U.S.C. § 1295. Based upon our review, it does not appear that the dis- trict court‘s jurisdiction arose in whole or in part under the laws governing this court's appellate jurisdiction. Accordingly, IT ls 0RDERED THAT: Absent a response received by this court within 14 days of the date of filing of this order, this appeal will be transferred to the United States Cou1't of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. FOR THE COUs'r ' FEB 08 2011 lsi J an Horba1y Date J an Horbaly Clerk cc: Robert C. Weems, Esq. J ames M. Hanavan, Esq. nmb 819 ""+&E'é‘§B€»fA’t°¢’iE"¢%"'.¥°“ ma rosa 2011 .|AN HORBALY CLEH(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Motor Works, LLC. v. Safer Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motor-works-llc-v-safer-technologies-inc-cafc-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack