Motor Transit Company v. Hutchinson

19 So. 2d 57, 154 Fla. 798, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 819
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1944
StatusPublished

This text of 19 So. 2d 57 (Motor Transit Company v. Hutchinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Motor Transit Company v. Hutchinson, 19 So. 2d 57, 154 Fla. 798, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 819 (Fla. 1944).

Opinions

BUFORD, C.J.:

We think the record clearly and positively establishes contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff which bars recovery and therefore judgment should be reversed.

So ordered.

*799 TERRELL, BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur. ' CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A. C. L. R. R. Co. v. Watkins
121 So. 95 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Jacksonville Electric Co. v. Dillon
64 So. 669 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Carter
65 So. 254 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)
Kird v. New Orleans & N. W. Ry. Co.
60 L.R.A. 727 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1902)
Lacey v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
136 N.W. 878 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 So. 2d 57, 154 Fla. 798, 1944 Fla. LEXIS 819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motor-transit-company-v-hutchinson-fla-1944.