Motor Transit Co. v. King

196 So. 192, 142 Fla. 767, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1460
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 17, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 192 (Motor Transit Co. v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Motor Transit Co. v. King, 196 So. 192, 142 Fla. 767, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1460 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful inspection of the record in this case and due consideration of the able briefs and arguments which have been submitted in behalf of the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record and that the judgment of the court below should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 192, 142 Fla. 767, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motor-transit-co-v-king-fla-1940.