Motor Transit Co. v. King

Supreme Court of Florida

Motor Transit Co. v. King

196 So. 192, 142 Fla. 767, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1460

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful inspection of the record in this case and due consideration of the able briefs and arguments which have been submitted in behalf of the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record and that the judgment of the court below should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

After a careful inspection of the record in this case and due consideration of the able briefs and arguments which have been submitted in behalf of the respective parties, the Court is of the opinion that there is no error in the record and that the judgment of the court below should be and is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur. Justice Whitfield not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Motor Transit Co. v. King, 196 So. 192, 142 Fla. 767, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1460 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

196 So. 192 (Motor Transit Co. v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.