Motor Transit Co. v. Driver

162 So. 883, 120 Fla. 293, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1388
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 3, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 So. 883 (Motor Transit Co. v. Driver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Motor Transit Co. v. Driver, 162 So. 883, 120 Fla. 293, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1388 (Fla. 1935).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

In this case a majority of the Court are of the opinion that the judgment to be rendered in this case on writ of error is within the rule of Jacksonville Traction Co. v. Greene, 113 Fla. 316, 151 Sou. Rep. 523, and that upon the authority of that decision the judgment in favor of plaintiff below as rendered in this case, should be affirmed, The fact that this court sitting as jurors might have decided the case otherwise on the facts is not deemed sufficient to warrant reversal where the verdict found is not clearly against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford, and Davis, J. J. concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winter Haven Fruit Sales Corp. v. Devane
162 So. 909 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 883, 120 Fla. 293, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/motor-transit-co-v-driver-fla-1935.