Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild v. International Sound Technicians, Cinetechnicians & Television Engineers of Motion Picture & Television Industries

Ninth Circuit

Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild v. International Sound Technicians, Cinetechnicians & Television Engineers of Motion Picture & Television Industries

806 F.2d 1410, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2349

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1986

DocketNo. 85-6559

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 806 F.2d 1410 (Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild v. International Sound Technicians, Cinetechnicians & Television Engineers of Motion Picture & Television Industries) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Motion Picture & Videotape Editors Guild v. International Sound Technicians, Cinetechnicians & Television Engineers of Motion Picture & Television Industries, 806 F.2d 1410, 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2349 (9th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The opinion filed September 26, 1986 is amended by adding a new footnote at 800 F.2d at 975, second column, at the end of the first paragraph, as follows:

“We do not intend to suggest by our discussion in the text that the district court did not have jurisdiction over the suit as an initial matter. See United Ass’n of Journeymen of Plumbing Industry, AFL-CIO v. Local 334, 452 U.S. 615, 627 [101 S.Ct. 2546, 2553, 69 L.Ed.2d 280] (1981) (holding that § 301 grants the federal courts jurisdiction over disputes between locals and internationals regarding union constitutions, but leaving open the question of ‘the substantive law to apply’).”

With this amendment, the petition for rehearing is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI